Why is the Developer Responsible for Upgrading Existing Street Lighting?

Why is the Developer Responsible for Upgrading Existing Street Lighting Under a Section 278 Agreement? (A question we get asked a lot! )

At MMA Lighting Consultancy Ltd, we’re often approached by developers who understandably ask:

“Why should we be responsible for upgrading the lighting at an existing entrance when it’s already adopted highway maintained by the council?”

The answer lies in impact and change of use. Under a Section 278 agreement, when a development introduces new vehicle movements or alters how an existing junction functions, the local highway authority requires that the infrastructure—including street lighting—be reviewed and upgraded where necessary.

This isn’t just about ticking boxes. It’s about ensuring the safety, compliance, and long-term suitability of the access in line with current lighting standards and usage demands driven by your development.

At MMA Lighting Consultancy Ltd, we specialise in street lighting design and technical support for Section 278 and 38 works. We help developers understand their obligations, avoid costly delays, and ensure lighting designs are fully approved by the adopting authority.

If you’re preparing for a Section 278 agreement or facing lighting upgrade queries on your site, let’s chat.

Section278 #StreetLighting #HighwayDesign #PlanningApproval #PropertyDevelopment #LightingConsultants #MMAConsultancy #Infrastructure #DevelopmentSupport